JIS S 0021-2:2018 包装―アクセシブルデザイン―開封性 | ページ 9

                                                                                             39
                                                                 S 0021-2 : 2018 (ISO 17480 : 2015)
G.4   器用さ
          器用さに関するチェック項目             チェック欄                 コメント
                                           はい/いいえ/非該当
   対象とする使用者は,包装の開封機構を容易に
   操作することができるか。
G.5   認知力
          認知力に関するチェック項目             チェック欄                 コメント
                                           はい/いいえ/非該当
   対象とする使用者は,開封方法を容易に理解で
   きるか。
G.6   開封位置
         開封位置に関するチェック項目            チェック欄                 コメント
                                           はい/いいえ/非該当
  対象とする使用者は,開封位置を容易に確認す
  ることができるか。
G.7   開封方法及び開封機構
         開封方法及び開封機構に関する           チェック欄                  コメント
                チェック項目
  開封方法及び開封機構は,容易に確認できるか。 はい/いいえ/非該当
  開封方法及び開封機構は,直感的に理解可能か。 はい/いいえ/非該当

――――― [JIS S 0021-2 pdf 41] ―――――

40
S 0021-2 : 2018 (ISO 17480 : 2015)
G.8   開封強さ及び取扱い
          開封強さ及び取扱いに関する             チェック欄                 コメント
                チェック項目
                                           はい/いいえ/非該当
  開封強さの設定値は,対象とする使用者の多様
  な開封力に対応しているか。
                                           はい/いいえ/非該当
  対象とする使用者の多種多様な器用さを配慮し
  たとき,包装及びその開封機構は容易に操作す
  ることができるか。
G.9   再封性
         再封性に関するチェック項目              チェック欄                 コメント
  包装は容易に再封することができるか。     はい/いいえ/非該当

――――― [JIS S 0021-2 pdf 42] ―――――

                                                                                             41
                                                                 S 0021-2 : 2018 (ISO 17480 : 2015)
                                          参考文献
  [1] ISO 8317,Child-resistant packaging−Requirements and testing procedures for reclosable packages
  [2] ISO 9186-1,Graphical symbols−Test methods−Part 1: Method for testing comprehensibility
  [3] ISO 9241-11:1998,Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)−Part 11:
          Guidance on usability
  [4] ISO 11156,Packaging−Accessible design−General requirements
        注記 対応日本工業規格(日本産業規格) : JIS S 0021 包装−アクセシブルデザイン−一般要求事項
  [5] ISO 11683,Packaging−Tactile warnings of danger−Requirements
  [6] ISO/IEC 19762 (all parts),Information technology−Automatic identification and data capture (AIDC)
          techniques−Harmonized vocabulary
  [7] ISO 20282-1,Ease of operation of everyday products−Part 1: Design requirements for context of use and
          user characteristics
  [8] ISO/TR 22411,Ergonomics data and guidelines for the application of ISO/IEC Guide 71 to products and
          services to address the needs of older persons and persons with disabilities
  [9] ISO 26800,Ergonomics−General approach, principles and concepts
  [10] ISO/IEC Guide 71,Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons
          with disabilities
  [11] CEN/TS 15945,Packaging−Ease of opening−Criteria and test methods for evaluating consumer packaging
  [12] JIS S 0022 高齢者・障害者配慮設計指針−包装・容器−開封性試験方法
  [13] Demura S., Minami M., Nagasawa Y., Tada N., Matsuzawa J., Sato S. Physical Fitness declines in older
          Japanese adults (2003)   ournal of Aging Physical Activity, 11, pp, 112-122
  [14] Rowson J., & Yoxall A. Hold, grasp, clutch or grab: Consumer grip choices during food container opening.
          Appl. Ergon. 2011, 42 (5)   p. 627-633
  [15] Technical Bulletin No. 103/2012−Part 1, Test method for determining the opening forces for peelable
          packaging systems, Test class I: Rigid packaging systems
  [16] Yoxall A., & Janson R. Fact or friction: A model for understanding the openability of wide- mouth closures.

Packaging Technology and Science. 2008, 21 pp. 137-147[17] Yoxall A., Kamat S.R., Langley J., Rowson J. Squeezability. Part 2: Getting stuff out of a bottle (2010)Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering

          Science, 224 (6), pp.1261-1271
  [18] Lewis J., & Sauro J. Estimating completion rates from small samples using binomial confidence intervals:
          Comparisons and recommendation. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, 2005 49th
          annual meeting, pp. 2100-2104
  [19] Lewis J., & Sauro J. When 100% Really Isnt 100%: Improving the Accuracy of Small-Sample Estimates of
          Completion Rates. J. Usability Stud. 2006, 1 (3)   p. 136-150
  [20] Abbott A. The Brains Decline, nature, Vol 492, (7427 Suppl), S4-S5
  [21] Schaie K. W. Intellectual Development in Adulthood: The Seattle Longitudinal Study, 1996
  [22] Craik F.I.M., & Bialystok E. Planning and task management in older adults: Cooking breakfast. Mem.

――――― [JIS S 0021-2 pdf 43] ―――――

42
S 0021-2 : 2018 (ISO 17480 : 2015)
          Cognit. 2006, 34 (6)   p. 1236-1249
  [23] Yoxall A., Langley J., Musselwhite C., Rodriguez-Falcon E.M., Rowson J.BE, Langdon P., Clarkson PJ,
          Robinson P. Husband, Daughter, Son and Postman, Hot-water, Knife and Towel: Assistive Strategies for
          Jar Opening. Designing inclusive interactions: Inclusive interactions between people and products in
          their contexts of use, 5th Cambridge workshop on universal access and assistive technology March
          22-25, 2010
  [24] Castel A.D., & Craik F.I.M. The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative
          information. Psychol. Aging. 2003, 18 (4)   p. 873-885
  [25] Sorensen H.S., Clement J., Gabrielsen G. Food labels-an exploratory study into label information and what
          consumers see and understand. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 2012, 22 (1)   p. 101-114
  [26] Dalke H., Corso A., Conduit G., Riaz A. Visibility Prediction Software: Five factors of Contrast Perception
          for People with Vision Impairment in the Real World. Designing inclusive systems, Proceedings 6th
          Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, Cambridge, UK, 2011
  [27] Bix L., Lockhart H., Selke S., Cardoso F., Olejnik M. Is x-height a Better Indicator of Legibility than Type
          Size for Drug Labels・ Packaging Technology and Science. 2003, 16 (5)   p. 199-207
  [28] Bix L., Seo W., Sundar R.P. The Effect of Colour Contrast on Consumers Attentive Behaviours and
          Perception of Fresh Produce (2012). Packaging Technology and Science (Article in Press)