19
X 33003 : 2019 (ISO/IEC 33003 : 2015)
フェーズ・要求事項 定義 方法及び参照
フェーズ5 : 構成概念の妥当性を確認する(反映的だけ)。
信頼性 ・カーマインズ及びツェラー[37]
プロセスインスタンスなどの同じものに適用される
−再テスト法
測定手段は,毎回同じ結果をもたらす。反映的モデ
−代替形態法
ルにおける合成値の信頼性は,通常,クロンバック
−折半法
のアルファ係数によって推定される。信頼性の三つ
−クロンバックのアルファ係数
の型を次に示す(フォーネル及びラーカー,1981)。
・個々の項目の信頼性 ・フォーネル及びラーカー[39]
・潜在変数の合成の測定量の信頼性(収束妥当性)
・潜在変数の一連の測定量から抽出された平均分散
(AVE)
変換妥当性 ・キャンベル及びフィスケ[36]
構成概念又は変数を測定するための複数の方法が同
・ワーツほか[45]
じ結果をもたらす程度。構成概念の中の各項目の測
・フォーネル及びラーカー[39]
定量は,同じ構成概念を測定するための別の方法と
見ることができる。 ・ベントラー及びボネット係数[33]
判別妥当性 ・AVE(フォーネル及びラーカー[39])
概念及びその測定量が,他の概念及びその測定量と
・拘束モデルと非拘束モデルとのカイ二
異なる程度。理論的に関連していない測定量間の関
係の欠如。 乗分析(フェンカートラマン[7])
フェーズ6 : 合成値を得るために項目の評定を集約する(反映的及び形成的)。
反映的な集約 合計,平均,因子得点など。 ・ブラウン[2]
・カーマインズ及びツェラー[37]
・分析的階層プロセス(AHP)(サーテ
ィ[27])
形成的な集約 補償モデル又は非補償モデル(形成的) ・附属書C
・分析的階層プロセス(AHP)(サーテ
ィ[27])
・MADM(ヨーン及びホワン[30])
・補償及び非補償モデル(ブラニック及
びブラニック[22],ムンダ及びナルド[24],
ムンダ及びナルド[25],ナルド[4],チョウ
ほか[31][32])
・SEI SCAMPI[5]
フェーズ7 : 感度分析を実施する。
感度分析 合成値の頑健性を評価する。 ・ISO/IEC 15504の試行例(ユング[23],
SPICEトライアル[43])
・順位付けの例(ナルド[4],サルテリ[28],
サルテリほか[29])
フェーズ8 : 補足的な妥当性テストを実施する。
予測妥当性 ・相関,回帰など(ボレン[1],ブラウン
構成概念が将来発生する外部基準と相関する程度。
[2],エルイーマン及びバーク[38],トロチ
ム及びドネリー[6])
並行妥当性 構成概念が既存の外部基準と相関する程度。 ・相関,回帰など(ボレン[1],ブラウン
[2],トロチム及びドネリー[6])
法則妥当性 ・相関,回帰など(ボレン[1],ブラウン
理論的なフレームワークの構築概念が,理論及び/
[2],トロチム及びドネリー[6])
又は以前の研究と一貫して相互に関連する程度。
――――― [JIS X 33003 pdf 21] ―――――
20
X 33003 : 2019 (ISO/IEC 33003 : 2015)
参考文献
一般
[1] BOLLEN K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York, 1989
[2] BROWN T.A. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. The Guilford Press, New York, 2006
[3] KELLEY T.L. Crossroads in the Mind of Man. Stanford University Press, California, 1928
[4] NARDO M. et al. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide [online].
2005 [Viewed 1 Feburary 2014].
[5] SCAMPI UPGRADE TEAM. Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) ,
Version 1.2: Method Definition Document (CMU/SEI-2006-HB-002). 2006 [Viewed 1 Feburary 2014].
Available from: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06hb002.pdf.
[6] TROCHIM W.M.K., DONNELLY J.P. Research Methods Knowledge Base. 2007 [Viewed 1 Feburary 2014].
[7] VENKATRAMAN N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and
measurement. Management Science. 1989, 35(8), 942-962. ISSN: 0025-1909 (print), 1526-5501 (online).
構成概念の開発
[8] HATTIE J. Methodology review: assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltenls. Applied Psychological
Measurement. 1985, 9(2), 139-164. ISSN: 0146-6216 (print), 1552-3497 (online).
[9] JOHNSON R. et al. To aggregate or not to aggregate: Steps for developing and validating higher-order
multidimensional constructs. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2011, 26(3), 1-8. ISSN: 0889-3268 (print),
1573-353X (online).
[10] LAW et al. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Academy of Management Review. 1998, 23(4),
741-755. ISSN: 0363-7425 (print), 1930-3807 (online).
[11] MAXWELL J.A. Qualitative Research Design: An interactive Approach. Sage Publications, CA, Second
Edition, 2005
[12] MILES M.B., HUBERMAN A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, CA, 1994
[13] GERBING D.W., ANDERSON J.C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating
unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research. 1988, 25(2), 186-192. ISSN: 0022-2437
(print), 1547-7193 (online).
操作化及び測定モデル
[14] COHEN J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960,
20(1), 37-46. ISSN: 0013-1644 (print), 1552-3888 (online).
[15] LAWSHE C.H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975, 28(4), 563-575. ISSN:
1744-6570 (online).
[16] DIAMANTOPOULOS A. Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models.
MIS Quarterly. 2011, 35(2), 335-358. ISSN: 0276-7783.
[17] DIAMANTOPOULOS A., WINKLHOFER H.M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative
to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research. 2001. 38(2), 269-277. ISSN: 0022-2437 (print),
――――― [JIS X 33003 pdf 22] ―――――
21
X 33003 : 2019 (ISO/IEC 33003 : 2015)
1547-7193 (online).
[18] EDWARDS, J., R. BAGOZZI. On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures.
Psychological Methods. 2000, 5(2), 155-174. ISSN: 1082-989 (print), 1939-146 (online).
[19] EDWARDS J.R. The Fallacy of Formative Measurement. Organizational Research Methods. 2011, 14(2),
370-388. ISSN: 1094-4281 (print), 1552-7425 (online).
[20] JARVIS C.B. et al. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in
marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research. 2003, 30(2), 199-218. ISSN: 0093-5301
(print); 1537-5277 (online).
[21] PETTER S. et al. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly. 31(4),
623-656. ISSN: 0276-7783.
集約
[22] BRANNICK M.T., BRANNICK J.P. Nonlinear and noncompensatory processes in performance evaluation.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1989, 44(1), 97-122. ISSN: 0749-5978.
[23] JUNG H.W. Process attribute rating and sensitivity analysis in process assessment. Journal of Software:
Evolution and Process. 2012, 24(4), 401-419. ISSN: 2047-7481 (online).
[24] MUNDA G., NARDO M. Weighting and aggregation for composite indicators. European Conference on Quality
in Survey Statistics (Q2006). Cardiff, UK, 2006.
[25] MUNDA G., NARDO M. Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible
setting. Applied Economics. 2009, 41(12), 1513-1523. ISSN 0003-6846 (print), 1466-4283 (online).
[26] RIJSDIJK S.A. et al. Product intelligence: its conceptualization, measurement and impact on consumer
satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2007, 35(3) 340-356. ISSN: 0092-0703 (print)
1552-7824 (online).
[27] SAATY T.L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research.
1990, 48(1), 9-26. ISSN: 0377-2217.
[28] SALTELLI A. Sensitivity Analysis in practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models. John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
West Sussex, UK, 2004
[29] SALTELLI A. et al. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK, 2008
[30] YOON K.P., HWANG C.-L. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. CA: Thousand Oaks, 1995.
[31] ZHOU P. et al. Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization
approach. Social Indicator Research. 2010, 96(1), 169-181. ISSN: 0303-8300 (print), 1573-0921 (online).
[32] ZHOU P. et al. Data aggregation in constructing composite indicators: A perspective of information loss. Expert
Systems with Applications. 2010, 37(1), 360-365. ISSN: 0957-4174.
妥当性テスト
[33] BENTLER. P.M., D.G. BONETT. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Psychological Bulletin. 1980, 88(3), 588-606. ISSN: 0033-2909 (print), 1939-1455 (online).
[34] BOLLEN. K.A. et al. Practical application of the vanishing tetrad test for causal indicator measurement models:
An example from health-related quality of life. Statistics in Medicine. 2009, 28(10), 1524-1536. ISSN:
1097-0258 (online).
――――― [JIS X 33003 pdf 23] ―――――
22
X 33003 : 2019 (ISO/IEC 33003 : 2015)
[35] BOLLEN, K.A., K.-F. TING. A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods. 2000, 5(1) 3-22. ISSN:
1082-989 (print), 1939-146 (online).
[36] CAMPBELL. D.T., D.W. FISKE. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Psychological Bulletin. 1959, 56(2) 81-105. ISSN: 0033-2909 (print), 1939-1455 (online).
[37] CARMINES. E., R. ZELLER. Reliability and Validity Assessment. CA: Thousand Oaks, 1979.
[38] EL EMAM. K., A. BIRK. Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process
capability. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 2000, 26(6), 541-566. ISSN 0098-5589.
[39] FORNELL. C., D.F. LARCKER. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and
Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981, 18(1), 39-50. ISSN: 0022-2437 (print), 1547-7193
(online).
[40] HIPP. J.R., et al. Conducting tetrad tests of model fit and contrasts of tetrad-nested models: A new SAS macro.
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2005, 12(1) 76-93. ISSN 1070-5511 (print),
1532-8007 (online).
[41] JUNG. H.-W. Evaluating interrater agreement in SPICE-based assessments. Computer Standards & Interfaces.
2003, 25(5), 477-499. ISSN: 0920-5489.
[42] NUNNALLY. J.C., H.H. BERNSTEIN. Psychometric Theory. 3 ed. NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
[43] SPICE TRIALS. SPICE Phase 2 Trials Final Report. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG10. 1999 [Viewed 1 Feburary
2014]. Available from: http://goo.gl/0pMK6.
[44] TING. K.-F. Confirmatory tetrad analysis in SAS. Structural Equation Modeling. 1995, 2(2), 163-171, 1995.
ISSN 1070-5511 (print), 1532-8007 (online).
[45] WERTS C. et al. Interclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 1974, 34(1), 25-33. ISSN: 0013-1644 (print), 1552-3888 (online).
(このJISに追加する参考文献)
[46] JIS X 33020 情報技術−プロセスアセスメント−プロセス能力のアセスメントのためのプロセス測
定フレームワーク
[47] ISO/IEC 33004,Information technology−Process assessment−Requirements for process reference, process
assessment and maturity models
JIS X 33003:2019の引用国際規格 ISO 一覧
- ISO/IEC 33003:2015(IDT)
JIS X 33003:2019の国際規格 ICS 分類一覧
JIS X 33003:2019の関連規格と引用規格一覧
- 規格番号
- 規格名称