ISO 19150-4:2019 地理的情報—オントロジー—パート4：サービスオントロジー | ページ 6

3.1.1

aggregation

<UML> special form of association (3.1.2) that specifies a whole-part relationship between the aggregate (whole) and a component part

Note 1 to entry: See <UML> composition (3.1.8) .

[SOURCE:ISO 19103:2015, 4.1]

3.1.2

association

<UML> semantic relationship that can occur between typed instances

Note 1 to entry: A binary association is an association among exactly two classifiers (including the possibility of an association from a classifier to itself).

[SOURCE:UML 2]

3.1.3

attribute

<UML> feature within a classifier that describes a range of values that instances of the classifier may hold

[SOURCE:UML 1]

3.1.4

cardinality

<UML> number of elements in a set

Note 1 to entry: Contrast with multiplicity (3.1.17) , which is the range of possible cardinalities a set may hold.

[SOURCE:UML 1]

3.1.5

class

<OWL> set of individuals (3.1.14)

[SOURCE:OWL]

3.1.6

class

<UML> description of a set of objects that share the same attributes (3.1.3) , operations, methods, relationships, and semantics

[SOURCE:UML 1]

3.1.7

codelist

value domain including a code for each permissible value

[SOURCE:ISO 19136:2007, 4.1.7]

3.1.8

composition

<UML> aggregation (3.1.1) where the composite object (whole) has responsibility for the existence and storage of the composed objects (parts)

[SOURCE:UML 2]

3.1.9

constraint

<UML> condition or restriction expressed in natural language text or in a machine readable language for the purpose of declaring some of the semantics of an element

[SOURCE:UML 2]

3.1.10

data property

<OWL> semantic association (3.1.2) between an individual (3.1.14) and a typed literal (3.1.15)

Note 1 to entry: Data properties were sometimes referred to as ‘concrete properties’ in Description Logic.

[SOURCE:OWL]

3.1.11

data type

specification of a value domain with operations allowed on values in this domain

Note 1 to entry: Datatypes are distinct from classes of individuals (3.1.14) , the latter are denoted by URIs and may be used by reference.

[SOURCE:ISO 19103:2015, 4.14, modified — EXAMPLE and Note 1 to entry have been replaced.]

3.1.12

domain

<ontology> restriction to constrain the subject class which participates in a subject-predicate-object triple

3.1.13

generalization

<UML> taxonomic relationship between a more general element and a more specific element of the same element type

Note 1 to entry: An instance of the more specific element can be used where the more general element is allowed.

[SOURCE:UML 2]

3.1.14

individual

instance of a class (3.1.5)

Note 1 to entry:"Individual" refers to a resource belonging to the extension of the class.

[SOURCE:OWL Web Ontology Language Guide — modified]

3.1.15

literal value

literal

constant, explicitly specified value

Note 1 to entry: This contrasts with a value that is determined by resolving a chain of substitution (e.g. a variable).

[SOURCE:ISO 19143:2010, 4.15]

3.1.16

metadata

information about a resource

[SOURCE:ISO 19115-1:2014, 4.10]

3.1.17

multiplicity

<UML> specification of the range of allowable cardinalities that a set may assume

[SOURCE:ISO 19103:2015, 4.24]

3.1.18

object property

<OWL> semantic association (3.1.2) between a pair of individuals (3.1.14)

Note 1 to entry: Object properties have sometimes been referred to as ‘abstract properties’ in Description Logic.

[SOURCE:OWL]

3.1.19

ontology

formal representation of phenomena of a universe of discourse (3.1.23) with an underlying vocabulary including definitions and axioms that make the intended meaning explicit and describe phenomena and their interrelationships

[SOURCE:ISO 19101-1:2014, 4.1.26]

3.1.20

property

<RDF> relation between subject resources and object resources

[SOURCE:RDF]

3.1.21

property restriction

<OWL> special kind of class (3.1.5) description through the definition of constraints on values and cardinalities

[SOURCE:OWL]

3.1.22

range

<ontology> restriction to constrain the class of objects which participate in a subject-predicate-object triple

Note 1 to entry: A range restriction can be thought of as a type constraint on the value of a function or range of a relation.

3.1.23

universe of discourse

view of the real or hypothetical world that includes everything of interest

[SOURCE:ISO 19101-1:2014, 4.1.38]